Or SIMD using uint16_t.
nice, and apparently I'm not the only one that is using memcpy instead of reinterpret_cast ;)
Yes, I always show assembly to the ones that have doubts.
yes, having UB because of `reinterpret_cast` is not our style :) Btw, showing assembly is a double-edge sword since it's often used as a "proof" that certain UBs "work" :)
yeah. I know ...
nice, and apparently I'm not the only one that is using memcpy instead of reinterpret_cast ;)
Yes, I always show assembly to the ones that have doubts.
yes, having UB because of `reinterpret_cast` is not our style :) Btw, showing assembly is a double-edge sword since it's often used as a "proof" that certain UBs "work" :)
yeah. I know ...